|
The
representation of topographic relief with the method of hill-shading,
is based on simulating the effect of natural light on earth’s surface,
under some necessary assumptions and simplifications that make the
result usable for cartographic purposes. The visual result of the
method is formed by the change of the tone of the portrayed surface,
which is due to the effect of light and the differentiation of
orientation on each point of the surface.
Images
of shaded relief made for cartographic use, are regularly made up with
light coming from north-west, as this has been proved to help all map
users, experienced or not, to perceive the forms of earth’s surface
relief in an immediate and accurate way.
|
|
Formation of a hill-shading image |
|
In
order to represent the main forms of relief which lie in the portrayed
area in a better way, the indicative, NW light direction may be
optimized, so that those relief forms which dominate, are vertically or
diagonally intersected (eg. west or south-west lighting for those forms
which are have N-S or NW-SE orientation).
However,
with the strict adherence on only one lighting direction for the whole
map, it is rather difficult to reveal all the relief forms of the
represented area, which may have several, different orientations. This
is partly treated by adjusting the main direction of light -in a
controlled way- on areas facing the light source. But the problem still
exists on hillsides which are not properly illuminated (or even not
illuminated at all). These areas are shaded by dark grey tones causing
visual confusion, hiding the information of relief or making difficult
to distinguish the superimposed cartographic symbols.
|
Hill-shading with indicative, NW lighting |
|
|
Hill-shading with lighting changed (north), according to dominant relief forms |
Hill-shading with adjusting the main direction of light, depending on local relief orientation |
In
order to emphasize all the relief forms, regardless of their
orientation, it is suggested to use an image of hill-shading based on
certain light directions, as a result of unifying four separate
hill-shading images corresponding to four main directions: north,
north-west, west and south-west. This integration is made by using
weights, as following:
SMD=WN*[SN]+WNW*[SNW]+WW*[SW]+WSW*[SSW],
In addition, the integration can be based on two alternative
approaches, which produce different results, in a quantitative and a
qualitative level.
On the
first approach, the integration is made for an entire image, using one,
global weight, depending on the percentage of the areas which face
towards the light source of this hill-shading image. These areas are
horizontally oriented towards a symmetrical range of 45° around the
azimuth of light direction and they are identified by using a digital
elevation model (areas having slopes less than a certain limit of slope
are considered flat, so they are filtered out and ignored). |
|
Integration of separate hill-shading images for creating an image of multi-directional hill-shading, with global weights per image, calculated by statistics on orientation values. |
On
the second approach, the integration is made on a cell-by-cell basis,
while the weights used for the corresponding cells of the separate
hill-shading images, are defined as functions of the horizontal aspect
of the cell. An example of such function is the following:
Wi=[(cos(Aspect-i)+1)]/2ΣWi, where i = 225°, 270°, 315°, 360°
and the value of weight Wi is maximized (equals to 1) when the azimuth is equal to angle i andit
is minimized when it’s different to it by 180°, while values between 0
and 1 are resulting in all other cases. Practically, this means that
those cells of the surface facing to the direction of azimuth i,
will participate more than the other cells of this particular
hill-shading image in the final combination. The azimuth values are
produced by the digital elevation model of the portrayed area, while it
is obvious that, in this approach, the weights of each component image
are matrices instead of a global, single value. |
|
Integration of separate hill-shading images for creating image of mult-directional hill-shading, with weights which are calculated on a cell-by-cell basis, as functions of local orientation. |
The
integrated image of multi-directional hill-shading does not replace the
original hill-shading image -based on the standard or the optimal light
direction depending on the global relief characteristics of the area-
but these two are combined with this function:
[SFIN] = [WM] * [SMO] + [(1-WM)] * [SORIG].
This
combination is also made on a cell-by-cell basis and the weight
component, WΜ, is a matrix whose values depend on the local incident
angle of the light direction, used on the original hill-shading image, i, as follows: [WM] = sin2
[i]. This way, as the incident angle of light gets closer to 90°, the
amount of light reaching the surface gets smaller, meaning that the
shading tone gets very dark, so that the multi-directional hill-shading
is prevailing in the final image. |
|
An example of calculating multi-directional hill-shading using the two approaches and combining it with the original hill-shading |
|
Samples of details from several stages of two approaches: (a) and (d) are from the initial shading,(b) and (e) are from the combination of initial shading with multi-directional made with global weights, and (c) and (f) are from the combination of initial shading with multi-directional made by cell-by-cell weights |
The
use of global weights, has a more restricted effect in the final
result, as the distribution of weights is done in the total images of
separate hill-shadings. The use of weights on a cell-be-cell basis has
more extended results, because they are applied in each, distinct
relief structure.
ttention
is needed in those cases where the enhancement of lighting is highly
increased and contrast is downgraded, because the last is necessary for
detecting the facing sides of relief forms, a most important visual cue
for hill-shading. It must be pointed out that the spatial resolution of
data (the resolution of the digital elevation model), directly related
to the scale of the collected height data, is a critical parameter for
the quality and the level of detail that is represented in the
hill-shaded relief. The more sufficient the resolution and the quality
of D.E.M. are, the more impressive and clear the results will be for
the portrayed relief model in its final hill-shading image.
|
Bibliography
- Tzelepis Ν., Loisios, D., Nakos Β., “A new method of analytical
hillshading by using different lighting directions”. Proceedings of the
10th National Cartographic Conference, Hellenic Cartographic Society,
Ioannina, 2008.
- Imhof E., 1982. Cartographic Relief Presentation, (Steward H.J., Ed.). Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, σελ. 389.
- Horn B.K.P., 1982. “Hill-shading and the reflectance map”, Geo-Processing, 2, σελ. 65-146.
- Mark R., 1992. “Multidirectional, oblique-weighted, shaded-relief
image of the Island of Hawaii”, U.S. Geological Survey. http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/1992/of92-422
- Jenny B., 2001. “An interactive approach to analytical relief shading”, Cartographica, Vol. 38, No. 1 & 2, σελ. 67-75. |
Tzelepis Nikos
Diploma of Rural & Surveying Engineer of N.T.U.A.
PhD Candidate
niktzel@survey.ntua.gr
|
|